Tesla (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk’s Thai Rescue Mission Creates another Controversy

Tesla (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk’s Thai Rescue Mission Creates another Controversy

Tesla (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk has managed to land in another controversy over a rescue mission he engineered in Thailand using a mini-sub. According to filings in court, Musk asked his employees to force Thai officials into praising him.

An embarrassing event

Musk can easily be crowned the king of controversy, but his most embarrassing incident was when he labeled Vernon Unsworth a “child rapist” and a “pedo guy.” Note that Unsworth is an expert diver and spelunker who criticized Musk’s involvement in a Thai rescue mission. It occurred when a soccer coach and his team of 12 boys were stuck in a flooded cave. Musk sent a mini-Sub to Thailand at the time to help them.

Tesla (TSLA) CEO Elon Musk’s Thai Rescue Mission Creates another Controversy

Unsworth filed a defamation case against Musk recently. The details of the filing were released on Monday which presenting some damning evidence against the Tesla and SpaceX CEO. Note that the whole episode started with Musk suggesting that he is working on a mini-submarine alongside his team that could carry the victims out of their helpless position. Unsworth commented during a TV interview that such a pod wouldn’t be of help. This triggered Musk who ranted against the diver online.

Unsworth unveils details of the case

According to Unsworth, Elon Musk and some of his affiliates went on to pay private investigators to find damning facts about the diver. One of the people tasked to do this task was a convicted felon. His team also pressurized the Thai officials to praise Musk and the mini-submarine while they were busy carrying out a deadly rescue mission.

Musk claimed last month that Unsworth has no reason to file a defamation case against him. He said that he didn’t really mean to call Unsworth a pedophile and was only using slang in his online rant. However, the plaintiff’s legal team didn’t take his comments at face value and said that the case should not be scrapped. L. Lin Wood and his team argued that the CEO had made several false and contradictory statements while under oath to protect himself.

They wrote,

“Musk’s accusations are false, defamatory, and were published negligently and with actual malice. His motion for summary judgment must be denied.”

Musk’s lawyer Alex Spiro has called this defamation case a money-grab scheme. He even suggested that Unsworth is working with an agent and intends to gain self-promotion and publicity alongside profits.

The attorneys from both sides are going back and forth on the issue in public.

All trading carries risk. Views expressed are those of the writers only. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The opinions expressed in this Site do not constitute investment advice and independent financial advice should be sought where appropriate. This website is free for you to use but we may receive commission from the companies we feature on this site.

Viraj loves to write and express his views on anything related to Finance, Crypto, or Fintech. He has been covering Finance & Crypto for more than five years now. He likes Tesla. He also writes on Healthcare, and Technology among other stuff.

HTML Snippets Powered By : XYZScripts.com