We use cookies to optimise our site and allow us and 3rd parties to tailor ads you see on sites. By using this site you agree to our cookie policy.


Peer to Peer Investing: 10% Return on Average For The Last 26 Years

FCA Introduces New Rules for Investors in the Peer-to-Peer Lending Sector

While peer to peer investing has only been around for a few years, business have obviously been lending money to individuals for quite some time.  From 1986 to 2011, the average return for credit card lending exceeded 10.5% based on Federal Reserve data.

Credit Card Lenders Average Annual Return

Peer to Peer Investing

This return is based on two numbers

  1. The average interest rate charged on credit card loans
  2. Charge-offs, which is the amount of debt that was not paid by the borrower.

If you subtract the charge-off rate from the interest rate, you get a baseline return. As the Fed data above does not factor in credit card fees and late penalties, the actual return on the loans was even higher.


Up until peer to peer investing was invented, it would have been difficult for income investors to get access to this investment.

Mr. Joseph Toms, the Chief Investment Officer of peer to peer investing company Prosper, suggests that over 80% of this debt is held directly on the books of 10 large US Banks. The implication is that unlike mortgages, which banks often sell to other investors, credit card debt is so profitable that the banks like to keep the loan on their books.

Peer to peer investing company Prosper and its main competitor,  Lending Club , are opening up the market for investing in unsecured consumer debt to individual investors as well.  Mr. Toms estimates the potential size of the P2P investing market to be $1.2 Trillion: $800 Billion in credit card debt and $400 billion in installment loans.  Currently the main peer to peer investing companies originate around $1 billion in loans per year. As this is only a fraction of a percent of the overall market, there is lots of room for growth.

From a borrower perspective, there are major differences between a Prosper loan and using a credit card to pay for a purchase. The borrower in a Prosper loan is taking a loan for a fixed amount, on average around $7,500, and agreeing to make a fixed dollar monthly payment over a 1, 3 or 5 year period. Payments include both interest and principal.  The payments are calculated so that at the end of the term the loan has been 100% paid back, and there is no additional money due.

Both peer to peer lending sites enable investors to open accounts with a minimum of $25, which is also the minimum investment you can make in one of the loans.  Although this is the peer to peer investing minimum, a much larger amount is recommended in order to provide diversification, and maximize investment performance.  Assuming 1 in 20 loans stop making payments, purchasing a portfolio of loans dramatically lower the chance that an investor will have more than 5% of their loans go bad. Investing $25 in 100 different loans would suggest a minimum account size of $2,500.  Both companies offer services that automatically spread your investment out among many loans, based on the size of your investment and risk preferences.

So far there appears to be relatively slow consumer adoption of the peer to peer investing side of the product. Prosper states that they currently have around 15,000 retail investors using the platform with an average loan portfolio of $4,000 to $5,000. Why are these numbers so low? Two potential reasons: When the P2P investing was first launched (2005-2009) peer to peer loan returns were negative. Launching into a recession was not the best of timing. Add to this stigma associated with unsecured consumer debt, and investors have been cautious.

Are investors right to be cautious about P2P investing?

I think the market for peer to peer investing has greatly improved since 2009, and peer to peer returns on average should approach the 10.5% + historical levels enjoyed by banks on credit card debt. The tools offered by both companies to evaluate potential loans are fantastic. Investors can see the borrowers credit-score, the amount of credit available to the borrower  from other sources, and the amount of money that they are borrowing compared to their income. More importantly, I think the Prosper and Lending Club are now setting borrowing rates at appropriate levels to insure that investors get a good return.

More Articles On P2P Lending
Prosper vs. Lending Club Comparison
Does Prosper Or Lending Club Offer Better Returns On P2P Loans
P2P Loans: 10% Returns On Average For The Last 26 Years
Top 5 Peer to Peer Lending Sites for Investors

Articles From P2P Expert – Peter Renton

Peter Renton on P2P Lending: Are You Asking the Right Question?
What are the Risks People Associate with Peer to Peer Lending?

All trading carries risk. Views expressed are those of the writers only. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The opinions expressed in this Site do not constitute investment advice and independent financial advice should be sought where appropriate. This website is free for you to use but we may receive commission from the companies we feature on this site.
David Waring

David Waring was the founder of LearnBonds.com and has been a major contributor to the extensive library of investing news and information available on the site. Until the launch of Learnbonds.com in late 2011 there was no single site on the internet catering exclusively to the individual bond investor. This was true even though more individuals own stocks than bonds. Learn Bonds was launched to fill that gap.

HTML Snippets Powered By : XYZScripts.com