One bond investor who lives in California says the only reason she holds bonds that were issued by her state is because of the tax savings. “With my income tax bracket, it made sense to buy bonds from my own state,” she said, adding that her investment helps significantly because she lives on a fixed-income. “I am saving money in taxes and I don’t see what’s wrong with that.”
She falls in the category of taxpayers who make more than $200,000 a year, and she says she feels she’s anything but wealthy. “It doesn’t seem fair,” the 52-year old woman said.
The Obama administration may beg to differ. When the proposal to limit certain taxpayers’ itemized deductions was announced yesterday, administration officials said that paying down the country’s $1.5 trillion deficit had to be a “shared sacrifice.” That means limiting the tax breaks that wealthier taxpayers are privy to in order to spare middle-income taxpayers the burden of carrying most of the weight.
Jeff Born, a finance professor and co-director of the MBA Program at Northeastern University in Boston, noted that considering President Obama is a Democrat, it is not surprising that he is calling for most of his new tax revenues to come from those who are wealthy and/or who have big incomes.
“The proposed cap on municipal bond interest income exclusions is consistent with the general philosophy. We would expect a Republican to make a different proposal,” Born said. “It is not surprising to see much of the unhappiness follow along party lines. As time goes on I would not be surprised to see those who are most ‘liberal’ within the Democratic party criticize the taxing proposals as not going far enough in taxing the rich.”
The logic, however, is not sufficient to tamper with the tax-exempt bond market, says William Hammer, a certified financial planner based in Long Island, N.Y.
“Turning federal tax-free municipal bond income into taxable income for high earners is a terrible idea,” Hammer said. “Investors accept lower interest rates in municipal bonds and allow local governments to borrow at much lower rates than corporations. This change would also probably cause a mass exodus from municipal bonds.”
Another way Obama’s proposed tax law change could affect the municipal bond market relates to the issuers of the debt. The change would significantly raise borrowing costs for local governments at a time when many of them are running huge deficits, Hammer pointed out.