U.S. Relaxes Franchise Wage Laws in Favor of Corporations

The U.S. Department of Labor made a rule that would make it more difficult to sue corporations over violation of franchise wage laws.

The rule will make it even harder for employees of a franchise to claim their wage law rights when their companies violate such laws.

According to the report, the enforcement of the rule will begin from March this year. It would to the advantage of franchisors that have been sued recently by workers as a result of franchisees violations.

McDonald’s among high-profile defendants

When this new rule takes effect, McDonald’s Corp would be one of the franchises that would benefit. The company has faced lots of high-profile cases, where it claimed it is a joint employer for franchise workers.

In October last year, the company was found not guilty of wage law violation after court hearings on a lawsuit filed against the company. The Federal Appeals court in San Francisco found the company not liable for any violations relating to wage laws.

The new rule will foster improved economic growth

Eugene Scalia, U.S. Labor Secretary, stated that the new rule would allow President Trump’s administration to address regulations that prevent economic growth correctly. She said the administration is trying to provide greater clarity to organizations and businesses that want to work together.

And by doing so, the government would be promoting an entrepreneurial culture that has been the main driver of American prosperity for decades.

Worker Advocacy groups and Unions rejected the new rule when it was initially proposed by the Department last April. According to the labor union, the new rule would make companies avoid being held liable even when they have some degree of control over working conditions. Also, the union said it would prevent a lot of workers from getting their pay they were owed under the FLSA.

The rule excluding companies that hire contract labor

The new rule is a slight replica of the earlier four-part test that states when companies are regarded as joint employers. According to the rule, they are regarded as joint employers only if they can set pay, supervise, hire, fire, and maintain employment records. Under the new rule, contractual employers ware automatically excluded.

The initial rule from the Obama Administration had other factors, including whether the workers are a vital part of the company’s business as well as the type of work being performed. Most Franchises complained about the old rule and feared a spike in lawsuits.

The new rule released yesterday will be legally binding, unlike the Obama-era regulation that was not.

All trading carries risk. Views expressed are those of the writers only. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The opinions expressed in this Site do not constitute investment advice and independent financial advice should be sought where appropriate. This website is free for you to use but we may receive commission from the companies we feature on this site.
Ali Raza

A journalist, with experience in web journalism and marketing. Ali holds a master degree in finance and enjoys writing about cryptocurrencies and fintech. Ali’s work has been published on a number of cryptocurrency publications.


Leading Social Trading Platform with 0% Commission

Leading Social Trading Platform with 0% Commission

Leading Social Trading Platform with 0% Commission


75% of investors lose money when trading CFDs.

Leading Social Trading Platform with 0% Commission

75% of investors lose money when trading CFDs.

HTML Snippets Powered By : XYZScripts.com