LearnBonds.com

Facebook Inc (FB) Plays the “Skills” Card on Diversity Failures

Facebook inc (NASDAQ:FB)
Rate this post

Facebook Inc (NASDAQ:FB) is being slammed after the company released new diversity data Friday. It highlighted that the diversity of its staff hasn’t changed, and it’s still predominantly white and male. This is troubling, argues many civil rights groups representing minorities and women.

Facebook inc Google inc

What Facebook Data Show

Facebook’s staff of tech employees is comprised of 84 percent men and 16 percent women. For non-tech workers that number stands at 52 percent women and 48 percent men.

The total number of women has gone up by one percent from 31 percent in 2014 to 32 percent in 2015. For minorities – blacks, Hispanics and mixed races – it has remained unchanged between two and four percent.

When it comes to senior leadership within the company, it is mostly filled up by white men. Seventy-seven percent of men make up senior positions and 23 percent of women are in senior roles. The number of Asian workers accounting for senior leadership positions grew to 21 percent this year, up from 19 percent last year. Hispanics working at senior levels went down from four percent to three percent.

Sheryl Sandberg, Facebook COO, conceded that the social network has “a long way to go.”

Maxine Williams, Facebook’s global head of diversity, alluded to a number of initiatives the company has taken to improve its workforce diversity. One of these includes a Facebook University training program. This endeavor allows college freshmen who belong to minorities to spend a summer working with Facebook mentors. It also has a training course to educate people about conversations regarding stereotypes.

While we have achieved positive movement over the last year, it’s clear to all of us that we still aren’t where we want to be. There’s more work to do,” wrote Williams in a blog post. “We remain deeply committed to building a workplace that reflects a broad range of experience, thought, geography, age, background, gender, sexual orientation, language, culture and many other characteristics. It’s a big task, one that will take time to achieve, but our whole company continues to embrace this challenge.”

The Diversity, Skills Divide

Facebook, which persists in rolling out new advancements, developments and updates in the realm of technology, isn’t the only tech firm facing a paucity of diversity within their offices.

Google, despite spending $150 million to diversify the makeup of its corporate culture, hasn’t accomplished much since last year. Of its more than 53,000 employees, only three percent are Hispanics and two percent are blacks. Although 60 percent of its workforce is white, more than one-third are Asian.

Other companies are gradually making diversity gains. Silicon Valley giants like eBay, Pinterest and Twitter are beginning to hire more women and minorities. These companies are just asking for more time because they “are going against hundreds of years of historical inequity.”

One argument being made is that there is a skills shortage occurring in the U.S., which accounts for the paucity of blacks and Hispanics in the tech sector.

This is also one of the reasons why Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg is a big proponent of H1B visas. Due to outdated immigration rules and the lack of educated STEM workers, an incredible number of skilled foreigners are being turned away. Essentially, immigration reform is vital for the continued success of numerous tech giants in Silicon Valley since many Americans aren’t entering the STEM industry.

Immigrants are far more likely than natives to study science and engineering and more likely to produce innovations in the form of patents,” wrote Gordon Hanson, University of California economist, in a 2011 study. “Expanding the supply of immigration visas for high-skilled workers increases patenting activity in science and engineering, particularly in U.S. high-tech firms.”

The supply and demand of the STEM field is at play, too. With a limited supply of skilled workers and a huge demand, the pay for H1B visa holders is in the $100,000 range at Google, Facebook and Amazon.

Many also feel that tech companies may blatantly disregard qualified applicants in favor of issues like race and gender.

Nevertheless prominent individuals, such as Jesse Jackson, president of the Rainbow/PUSH Coalition, still urge tech titans to continue hiring underrepresented minorities.

Google, eBay and Facebook 2015 numbers clearly demonstrate that more must be done, as the numbers for tech and nontech positions are virtually identical to 2014,” Jackson said in a statement. “Facebook and other tech companies must go beyond aspiring to do better and set measurable goals, targets and timetables to move the needle in diversity and inclusion.”

Views expressed are those of the writers only. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Trading comes with severe risk. The opinions expressed in this Site do not constitute investment advice and independent financial advice should be sought where appropriate. This website is free for you to use but we may receive commission from the companies we feature on this site.
Avatar

Andrew Moran

3 Comments

  1. It is rare that one finds so many blatant falsehood, half-truths, and misleading/distorted statements in a single published “article”. This is NOT “news” — this is blatant propaganda from the tech lobby to further their goal of importing MORE CHEAP FOREIGN LABOR. Meanwhile this nation has an ABUNDANCE of citizens with the skills, education, and intelligence for all jobs. There is NO SHORTAGE — it is a BALD-FACE LIE. And no one should be misled by the “lobbying” and propaganda funded by over $2B from these tech corporations. The REAL QUESTION for citizens? Whether this nation should tolerate corporations that refuse their taxes and hiring of citizens — yet spend BILLIONS to corrupt and pervert our government.
  2. There is no STEM crisis. There is in fact a surplus of US workers for STEM: http://www.forbes.com/sites/georgeleef/2014/06/06/true-or-false-america-desperately-needs-more-stem-workers/ Watch Dan Rather’s Doc: No Thanks For Everything https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OeoBWzIRuic The immigration attorneys from Cohen & Grigsby explain how they assist employers in running classified ads with the goal of NOT finding any qualified applicants, and the steps they go through to disqualify even the most qualified Americans in order to secure green cards for H-1b workers. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCbFEgFajGU http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programmers_Guild On May 2, 2008 a civil court judge sided with the Programmers Guild in their complaint against a Pittsburgh computer consulting company and ordered it to pay $45,000 in penalties for discriminating against legal US residents by advertising only for developers on H-1B visas. The case was brought against iGate Mastech for placing an advertisement for thirty computer programmers in 2006 “that expressly favored H-1B visa holders to the exclusion of US citizens, lawful permanent citizens and other legal US workers” according to the US Department of Justice.[8] http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/did-you-know-obama-just-took-new-executive-action-on-immigration/article/2562053 http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/international/238574-trade-agreement-is-a-trojan-horse-for-obamas-immigration Obama just expanded definitions of “specialized knowledge” and no rule to hire US workers first leads to even more abuse of the L1-B Visas Here’s where Job Brokers abuse the H1B Visas, provide fake job histories and resumes, provide bogus training: http://www.revealnews.org/article/job-brokers-steal-wages-entrap-indian-tech-workers-in-us/ http://www.wowt.com/home/headlines/Grassley-Statement-Concerning-Immigration-Reforms-296630751.html
  3. BTW, this article is clearly a shill H-1b article. Most H-1b visas are used by Offshore Outsourcing companies to remove jobs from the United States. H-1b is a sick government handout that deprives workers of their right to move on to other jobs. As such parasitic business interest have taken over the country, while our President and Congress stand-by and do-nothing. What happens at Silicon Valley tech companies is that friend hire friends. “Brogrammer” is the operating word. And the “Brogrammatical” hiring program is the default at most Silicon Valley companies. If you are person of European ancestry, you tend to have more friend who are of that ancestry. So when you recommend people, well you recommend your friends first. They go to the top of the stack and get an interview. Similarly east Asian. Similarly south Asian. Unfortunately, Black and Hispanic people are not getting involved in companies early enough at the start to make a meaningful difference to this default hiring method. And in the case where friends hire friends, your initial representation at a company plays a huge role in the future size of your minorties’ representation when the company grows. One side affect of the friends hire friends model is that smaller groups get fewer referrals, and so have a smaller participation rate as the company grows. Smaller minorities get pushed out. AND ISN’T THAT IN FACT WHAT WE SEE IN THE DATA. Europeans and Asians, being sizable groups in Silicon Valley have a disproportionate representation at newly formed Silicon Valley companies. South Asians are in on the H-1b visa (66% of all H-1b’s went to India this year). South Asians are getting all of the starting jobs, via the H-1b visa. South Asians will also recommend their friends in high numbers (not unusual) but that in particular would account for their representative levels. One way to curb that cycle, and make more starting jobs available to blacks and hispanics would be to require greater diversity in the H-1b visa or limit the number of H-1b visas given out. Unfortunately, Blacks and Hispanics graduate in too small a percentage of the total IT graduation class, to break the “Bro-Grammer” hiring cycle. Everyone else goes through HR, and HR looks at whatever the agenda is, and if there is no match, your resume hits the bit bucket.

Reply

Your email address is not published.