Prosper vs. Lending Club – A Head to Head Comparison for Investors


In this article below we give a head to head comparison of Prosper vs. Lending Club from an investor’s perspective.  Our analysis is based on the following factors: company size, average P2p loan returns, fees, services and support.

Prosper vs. Lending Club Size: ($ Amount of New Loans Originated Per Month)

Lending Club  issues about $35 million in new peer to peer loans per month. Prosper, about $10 Million.

Comparing Prosper vs. Lending Club based on size matters for the following reasons:

  1. For an investor the bigger the pool of loans the easier it is to diversify.  Both Prosper and Lending Club heavily emphasize the benifits of diversification.
  2. A larger number of loans also means a more active secondary market.  That is the market where you go if you want to re-sell your loans. Both Prosper and Lending club  have a secondary market.  The monthly turnover in the Lending Club Secondary Market is about $6M.  Investors are  able to sell their Lending Club loans for 99.4% of the original amount on average.

Prosper vs. Lending Club: Average Returns & Fees

When comparing Prosper vs. Lending club,  the fee structure for investors is basically the same.  1% Annual Service Fee

Both firms offer an enormous amount of statistical data regarding peer to peer lending returns.

The high rated loans from Prosper and Lending Club will have similar performance. The same for lower rated, higher risk loans. As both firms have slightly different methodologies for rating loans (for example one uses FICO and the SCOREX credit scores), there may be an opportunity for smart investors to find pockets of opportunity where the loans of one firm outperform the other.

  • Prosper Seasoned Returns* on all Loans (includes charge-offs) 10.46%
  • Lending Club  Returns on D Rated Loans (includes charge-offs) 10.34%

*Prosper focuses on “seasoned returns”.  A seasoned return is a loan that has been around for over 10 months.  For “seasoned” markets like the markets for bank laons, I think this approach makes sense.  However, for peer to peer lending I am not sure this methodology is correct, given how fast the industry is growing.  If you exclude  loans issued in the last 10 months with Lending Club, you would be excluding the performance of over half their loans. 

Prosper vs. Lending Club: Services & Support

Both Prosper and Lending Club have an easy to use online platform for buying and monitoring the performance of your loans. You can select individual loans or use their selection feature.  The selection feature allows you to diversify among hundreds with minimal effort.  You can invest using a regular or IRA account as well.

If you look at Lending Club vs. Prosper through the lens of  institutional accounts, Lending Club has the edge. They have two investment funds designed to make it easy for institutional investors to participate. They report having over 65 investors who have invested more than $1 Million  each, either directly or via the funds. To me the fact that institutional investors are interested in this market provides additional validation to investors.  

More Articles On P2P Lending

Prosper vs. Lending Club Comparison
Does Prosper Or Lending Club Offer Better Returns On P2P Loans
P2P Loans: 10% Returns On Average For The Last 26 Years
Top 5 Peer to Peer Lending Sites for Investors

Articles From P2P Expert – Peter Renton

Peter Renton on P2P Lending: Are You Asking the Right Question?
What are the Risks People Associate with Peer to Peer Lending?

Print Friendly


Comments

  1. Yvan De Munck says

    Very good to see a plain vanilla and constructive analysis of the 2 main players in this emerging field that promises great potential for various actors.
    The P2P funding phenomenon will only get more traction, as more institutional money is moving in, and the newly voted JOBS act is poised to support and highlight the industry as a viable alternative and add-on to “classic banks”. To witness, I am an advisor to the first regulatory approved P2P investment fund in Europe (Luxembourg) that will invest in US consumer credit/loans via platforms like LendingClub and Prosper. On the US side, I am aware of similar initiatives, each one of them clearly supporting further strong growth. It should be welcomed – as I welcome more open discussion and comments. (@isocialbroker)

    • Catalano says

      Probably a majority of pelpoe who go to Cash Advance Stores have horrible credit or are not financially sound. It is going to be difficult to figure out a percentage or even a ballpark though. Why would someone go and pay those outrageous interest rates if they could go to a bank and get a traditional loan or buget their money better and not get into that situation?

  2. Matt says

    As someone who has used Lending Club for a long time, I’d have to say I find the company a little shaky. I once watched one of their investing webinars when they were starting up, and the leaders of the company made some pretty rough comments when they thought the mic was off afterwards. Nothing corrupt or illegal, just vulgar and unprofessional — which I think represents what’s going on behind the scenes quite well. Their policies are also very anti-investor — they almost always waive late fees (which are supposed to go to lenders), and collections are a joke. They allow people to request $35,000 without requiring so much as a reason why – most of their loans now have blank descriptions (avoid the auto-investing feature!). My dealings with their investor customer service have been poor, too — often taking several days to get a response and you never can get a name of who’s helping you. Often you’ll just get a “thank you for your patience” along with a canned response anyway – again, they just don’t seem to respect the investor. Also, their 1% fee is a misnomer – they round and never make up for it, so you’ll actually end up paying around 1.5 to 2% in fees.

  3. Shirley says

    Lending Club locks out many people from various different states from participating in the P2P lending.  Oregon is a lockout.  I’m not sure what other states are not permitted to invest in the P2P portion.

    • davidwaring says

      Hi Shirley,  Yep that is correct unfortunately some states do prevent individuals from participating but more and more are allowing it and hopefully more and more will open up to it in the future.  

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *